Saturday, December 8, 2012

Religion and The Military



RELIGION AND THE MILITARY

I have been following the story of the young man who just dropped out of West Point six months prior to graduating, citing intolerable persecution because of his atheism.  And I am in a personal quandary as to how to react to the situation.  As an atheist, I would like to be able to support a fellow non-believer.  I recognize that we atheists are among the most hated minority groups in our country.  All you have to do is read the hate filled comments coming from those who claim to belong to a religion that loves their brothers to see the truth of that.  But I am just not sure that I trust his motives and/or perceptions. 
Not having been there with him, the only thing I have to go by is my own personal experiences in the military, both on the enlisted and officer sides of the house.  Was I ever forced to attend religious services?  Depends on what you mean by forced.  First, everyone had to state a religious preference when entering boot camp.  At that time, late 60’s, your choices were catholic, protestant, or Jewish; maybe it was called other.  I’m not real sure.  And you either went to chapel or you cleaned the barracks.  That could have been considered a de-facto forcing to attend services.  It didn’t bother me.  I could sleep in church services and couldn’t while cleaning the barracks. 
In OCS I just don’t remember the subject of religious services even coming up.  I’m sure there were services for those who wanted to go, but if anyone did they kept their faith private.  The rest of my career was pretty much religion neutral.  Sure, there were change of command ceremonies and such where a chaplain would pray.  But I never listened to the chaplain any more than I listened to the farewell speech from the commander leaving or the introductory speech from the newly arriving commander.  It was all words for the sake of words and taking my liberty time. 
Occasionally, someone would ask me if I’d like to attend church or otherwise approach me about religion.  If they were polite about it, I’d politely say no.  If they were what I felt was overly aggressive, I’d tell them I had no intention of associating with a group of barbarians who advocated human sacrifice and cannibalism.  (The death of a perfect person-Jesus- on the cross to save the sins of the believers is no different in my eyes from tossing a perfect person-virgin-over a cliff or into the sea for the same reasons.  And if you believe the preachers that the wine and wafer of communion actually transmute to the blood and body of Christ, what else is that but cannibalism?)  So this young man’s being called a heathen doesn’t impress me as being overly abusive. 
What I have seen over the last few decades is actually a more open military, religiously.  The government has paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to pagans, whose religious freedoms were trampled for centuries.  Now, wiccans and other pagans can openly worship, and know that their supervisors can be court-martialed and reduced in rank if they try to persecute them for such worship.  Yes, there are some too dumb to understand that freedom of worship applies to all, not just them.  But they are easy to put in their place.  Their careers are the ones at risk, not yours.
Which brings us to the present case.  I could understand the young man’s dropping out of West Point after the first year or two if he felt that he was being mistreated.  I can understand a person of strong convictions STAYING IN and still bringing suit for what he perceived as persecution.  But to wait until he is told that his clinical depression will keep him from receiving a commission (which it should!), strikes me as being sour grapes. 
I am not proud to call this young man a brother atheist.  He brings shame to the rest of us.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Understanding Personal Worth And Respecting Differences (UPWARD)

Just found this draft that I had been working before and never got around to finishing.  I'll go ahead and post it as is and hope to get back to it later .....as soon as I remember which nail I was getting around to driving.




Probably the greatest aspect of our country, at least in my mind, is the stated belief that all persons are born with the inate rights of free expression of personal beliefs regardless of ones race, religion, political ideals, physical status, gender, sexual orientation...the list goes on.  All are "created" or born equal!

 But that's a tough one to live up to in the real world.

For purposes of this post, when I speak of some aspect, idea, cultural belief, etc as being "better" I will not mean more worthy of respect but simply easier in our society  to attain success.  For instance, it is "better" to be tall than to be short, at least for a man.  Tall men command more respect, are listened to more, and get promoted faster than short men.  Just a fact of life.  Tall men are not necessarily "better" at their jobs or smarter or even more pleasing to be around.  But it is "better" to be tall, all other things being equal.  Even so, short folk deserve the same basic human rights and the same dignity as tall folk.  Is a short man just as good as a tall man?  Definitely yes!  Is it just as good to be short as it is to be tall?  Definitely NO! 

So...the "ideal" person (the best thing to be) in our current society is a tall, white, straight male, attractive of features, having an above average IQ, BMI between 20 and 24, with moderate political and moderate Christian religious beliefs, and born of a well-to-do family. 

Obviously, very few Americans meet all ten of those qualifications.  (And those are only a random ten.)  I don't even meet half of them.  Therefore, if we want to have any kind of civilized society at all we have to learn to accept the differences of others and be willing to accomodate said differences.  This does NOT mean we should be blind to our own "better" aspects or that we should try to emulate the differences of others.  It means that we should first of all we willing to accept ourselves for who we are, good and bad...or desirable and undesirable if you prefer...  There is no need to be ashamed of our "good" traits.  We certainly wouldn't try to change them just to make others feel more comfortable.  Nor should we refrain from trying to change our "bad" traits where physically possible.

Some things just are and can't be changed.  Some things CAN be changed.  Some things are modified by environment. 

There is scientific evidence that alcoholism is a genetic trait.  Some people are born to be alcoholics.  That does not mean they have fewer rights than others.  It just means they have to work harder to overcome their handicap.  Non-alcoholics need to understand what factors make an alcoholic what he is and work toward treatment rather than condemnation.  But that does not mean that non-alcoholics must embrace the behavior of alcoholics. 

And just because some who abuse alcohol are genetic alcoholics, it doesn't follow that all who abuse alcohol have the same genetic trait.  Many, and I would submit most, alcohol abusers abuse alcohol as a learned behavior.

Religion and Politics

I am, as previously noted, an atheist.  When I describe myself politically as a republican I often get some weird looks.  "How can you be an atheist and a republican?" I am asked.  I usually respond by asking, "How could anyone possibly be a Christian and a member of the republican party?"  Examine the teachings of The Christ.  He directed that all goods are to be held in common.  The very origin of the expression "From each according to their abilities; to each according to their needs" is Christian teachings.  Some of our first colonies, in fact, were founded as communistic experiments; those being the Puritan/Pilgrim colonies.  It wasn't until those colonies embraced the capitalistic beliefs of private ownership of property, individual wealth attained for individual effort, and the like that our country began to grow and prosper.

So I believe we should all disabuse ourselves of the notion that a person's religion can determine the person's political beliefs.  It is also my belief that Christians have no business in the Republican party.

Note: this is just a stub article.  My thoughts and ideas haven't been fully developed and i'm sure i will want to rephrase what I already have.  I jst post this as is for now so that anyone following will get an idea where I am coming from.  (Later, David!  lol)